<div>
  <h2>A Controversial Proposal: Federal AI Moratorium on State Regulations</h2>

  <p id="speakable-summary" class="wp-block-paragraph">A federal proposal aiming to pause state and local regulations on AI for a decade is on the verge of becoming law, as Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) and others push for its inclusion in an upcoming GOP budget package ahead of a crucial July 4 deadline.</p>

  <h3>Supporters Claim It Fosters Innovation</h3>
  <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Prominent figures like OpenAI's Sam Altman, Anduril's Palmer Luckey, and a16z's Marc Andreessen argue that a fragmented state-level regulation of AI would hinder American innovation, especially as the competition with China intensifies.</p>

  <h3>Strong Opposition from Various Groups</h3>
  <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Critics, including many Democrats and some Republicans, labor organizations, AI safety advocates, and consumer rights groups, assert that this measure would prevent states from enacting laws to protect consumers from AI-related harms, allowing powerful AI firms to operate with little oversight.</p>

  <h3>Republican Governors Push Back</h3>
  <p class="wp-block-paragraph">On Friday, 17 Republican governors sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson, urging the removal of the so-called “AI moratorium” from the budget reconciliation bill, as reported by <a href="https://www.axios.com/pro/tech-policy/2025/06/27/republican-governors-want-state-ai-pause-out-of-budget-bill" target="_blank">Axios</a>.</p>

  <h3>Details of the Moratorium</h3>
  <p class="wp-block-paragraph">This provision, nicknamed the “Big Beautiful Bill,” was added in May and would prevent states from “[enforcing] any law or regulation regulating [AI] models, [AI] systems, or automated decision systems” for ten years. This could nullify existing state laws, such as <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2024/10/04/many-companies-wont-say-if-theyll-comply-with-californias-ai-training-transparency-law/" target="_blank">California’s AB 2013</a>, which mandates disclosures about AI training data, and Tennessee’s ELVIS Act, protecting creators from AI-generated fakes.</p>

  <h3>Widespread Impact on AI Legislation</h3>
  <p class="wp-block-paragraph">The moratorium threatens numerous significant AI safety bills currently awaiting the president's signature, including <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2025/06/13/new-york-passes-a-bill-to-prevent-ai-fueled-disasters/" target="_blank">New York’s RAISE Act</a>, which would require comprehensive safety reports from major AI labs nationwide.</p>

  <h3>Creative Legislative Tactics</h3>
  <p class="wp-block-paragraph">To incorporate the moratorium into a budget bill, Senator Cruz adapted the proposal to link compliance with the AI moratorium to funding from the $42 billion Broadband Equity Access and Deployment (BEAD) program.</p>

  <h3>Potential Risks of Non-Compliance</h3>
  <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cruz's revised legislation states the requirement ties into $500 million in new BEAD funding but may also revoke previously allocated broadband funding from non-compliant states, raising concerns from opponents like Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA), who argues that it forces states to choose between broadband expansion and consumer protection.</p>

  <h3>The Road Ahead</h3>
  <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Currently, the proposal is paused. Cruz's initial changes cleared a procedural review earlier this week, setting the stage for the AI moratorium to feature in the final bill. However, reporting from <a href="https://x.com/benbrodydc/status/1938301145790685286?s=46" target="_blank">Punchbowl News</a> and <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-06-26/future-of-state-ai-laws-hinges-on-cruz-parliamentarian-talks?embedded-checkout=true" target="_blank">Bloomberg</a> indicates discussions are resurfacing, with significant debates on amendments expected soon.</p>

  <h3>Public Opinion on AI Regulation</h3>
  <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cruz and Senate Majority Leader John Thune have promoted a “light touch” governance approach, but a recent <a href="https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2025/04/03/how-the-us-public-and-ai-experts-view-artificial-intelligence/#:~:text=Far%20more%20of%20the%20experts,regarding%20AI's%20impact%20on%20work." target="_blank">Pew Research</a> survey revealed that a majority of Americans desire stricter AI regulations. Approximately 60% of U.S. adults are more concerned that the government won’t regulate AI adequately than the potential for over-regulation.</p>

  <em>This article has been updated to reflect new insights into the Senate’s timeline for voting on the bill and emerging Republican opposition to the AI moratorium.</em>
</div>

This rewritten article includes optimized headlines and subheadlines for better search engine visibility while maintaining the essence of the original content.

Sure! Here are five FAQs with answers based on the topic of Congress potentially blocking state AI laws:

FAQ 1: What does it mean that Congress might block state AI laws for a decade?

Answer: It means that Congress is considering legislation that would prevent individual states from enacting their own regulations or laws regarding artificial intelligence (AI). This could limit states’ abilities to address specific concerns or challenges posed by AI technology for an extended period, potentially up to ten years.

FAQ 2: Why would Congress want to block state laws on AI?

Answer: Congress may believe that a uniform federal approach to AI regulation is necessary to ensure consistency across the country. This could help prevent a patchwork of state laws that might create confusion for businesses and stifle innovation, ensuring that regulations do not vary significantly from state to state.

FAQ 3: What are the potential consequences of blocking state AI laws?

Answer: Blocking state laws could lead to several outcomes:

• It may streamline regulations for companies operating nationally.
• It might delay addressing specific regional concerns related to AI misuse or ethical implications.
• States may lose the ability to tailor AI regulations based on local priorities and needs, leading to potential gaps in oversight.

FAQ 4: How might this affect companies developing AI technologies?

Answer: Companies could benefit from reduced regulatory complexity, as they would have to comply with one set of federal laws rather than varying state regulations. However, the lack of state-level regulations may also result in fewer safeguards being in place that could protect consumers and address local issues.

FAQ 5: What are the arguments in favor of allowing states to create their own AI laws?

Answer: Advocates for state-level regulation argue that local governments are better positioned to understand and address the unique impacts of AI on their communities. State laws can be more adaptive and responsive to specific challenges, such as privacy concerns or employment impacts, which might differ significantly across regions.

Source link