House Approves Ratepayer Protection Act to Address Data Center Power Expenses – Unite.AI

U.S. House Passes Ratepayer Protection Act to Address Data Center Power Costs

The U.S. House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly on September 16, 2026, passing the Ratepayer Protection Act with a significant majority of 417 to 3. This legislation mandates that state utility regulators require large data center customers to bear the full financial burden of grid upgrades needed for their operations.

The pivotal vote was announced by key figures including House Energy and Commerce Chairman Brett Guthrie from Kentucky, Subcommittee on Energy Chairman Bob Latta of Ohio, and Representative Gabe Evans of Colorado, who sponsored the bill. The discussion began on September 15, 2026, with an amendment, followed by a 40-minute debate and a roll-call vote held the next day.

Key Statements from Bill Sponsors

In a joint statement, Guthrie emphasized that responsible development of data centers translates into enhanced investments and infrastructure advancements in local communities. He highlighted that the act ensures that large companies, rather than American families and small businesses, are accountable for the energy they consume. Latta echoed this sentiment, noting that communities considering new data center projects deserve clarity regarding grid impacts: “American families shouldn’t face higher electricity bills just so big tech firms can operate data centers.” Evans remarked that the legislation ensures large data centers cover their necessary infrastructure costs while allowing states to adapt the measures to suit their individual needs.

Legislative Requirements of the Bill

The new federal standard introduced by the bill amends Section 111(d) of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978. According to the official text issued on September 10, 2026, any rates set by electric utilities for large-load customers must account for the complete, incremental costs of generation, transmission, or distribution upgrades necessary for those customers. This includes costs arising from contract termination or reduced electricity purchases. Utilities must obtain financial assurance from customers before proceeding with any upgrades.

The act defines a large-load customer as a non-residential entity that, after the enactment date, agrees to purchase electricity for facilities primarily used for IT infrastructure, with a combined peak demand of at least 100 megawatts. This definition primarily targets facilities like data centers, as summarized by the Congressional Research Service.

Each state regulatory authority, along with nonregulated electric utilities, will have one year from the enactment date to either adopt this standard or schedule a hearing, reaching a determination within two years. States that have already implemented comparable standards before enactment will be exempt from these obligations. This approach maintains state control over electricity markets while encouraging fiscal responsibility, aligning with efforts already underway in 24 states to protect residential homes and small businesses.

Bill’s Journey Through Committee

Representative Gabe Evans, alongside Representative Castor of Florida, introduced the bill on June 18, 2026. It was quickly advanced through the Subcommittee on Energy and later approved by the full committee on a unanimous vote of 52-0 after markup sessions held on July 20 and 21. The Energy and Commerce Committee reported the amended bill on September 10, 2026, placing it on the Union Calendar. The measure is touted as bipartisan.

According to a July 21, 2026, press release, Guthrie shared that extensive consultations took place involving the data center sector, major tech firms, state regulators, and utilities, underscoring Congress’s role in safeguarding families facing electricity costs. Latta noted that several states, including Ohio, already have large-load tariffs for data centers.

Context for the Legislation

A summary prepared by the chairman’s office indicates that the bill codifies the White House’s Ratepayer Protection Pledge established earlier in 2026, where tech giants like Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and over 300 other organizations committed to community protection against rising costs due to data center development.

The document cites multiple instances where responsible data center development has benefitted host communities, including Georgia Power’s three-year pause on residential rate increases and $7 billion savings for customers in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Mississippi due to recent agreements with large-load data centers. Additional points highlight Virginia’s significant reductions in residential transmission costs alongside increased financial contributions from data centers, and Loudoun County, Virginia, generating $1.1 billion in data center tax revenue, covering nearly 40% of the county’s general fund.

Responses and Future Outlook

Representative Veronica Escobar from Texas voted in favor of the bill but labeled it as “the absolute bare minimum Congress should do,” indicating a need for stronger actions to protect American communities. She referenced additional data center-related legislation she supports, such as the Power for the People Act, aimed at ensuring that data centers bear full responsibility for their energy and infrastructure demands.

The bill now advances to the Senate, where Latta is advocating for prompt action to facilitate its swift passage to the President’s desk.

Here are five FAQs based on the topic of the House passing the Ratepayer Protection Act on data center power costs:

FAQ 1: What is the Ratepayer Protection Act?

Answer: The Ratepayer Protection Act is legislation aimed at regulating the costs associated with electricity used by data centers. It seeks to protect consumers from potential spikes in power costs that could result from increased energy demands by these facilities.

FAQ 2: How does this act benefit consumers?

Answer: The act is designed to stabilize energy costs for consumers by ensuring that data centers contribute fairly to the energy grid. It aims to prevent substantial cost increases that could burden ratepayers due to the rising energy demand from these facilities.

FAQ 3: What are the implications for data centers?

Answer: Data centers will be held accountable for their energy consumption, with requirements for more transparent reporting and possibly new regulations. This could impact their operational costs, prompting them to seek more efficient energy solutions.

FAQ 4: How does this legislation address environmental concerns?

Answer: By promoting energy efficiency and requiring data centers to disclose their energy usage, the act encourages the adoption of cleaner energy sources, potentially reducing the carbon footprint associated with high energy consumption in tech infrastructure.

FAQ 5: What are the next steps for this legislation?

Answer: Following the House’s approval, the Ratepayer Protection Act will move to the Senate for consideration. If passed, it will be signed into law, prompting the development of specific regulations and guidelines for implementation.

Source link

New York Governor Kathy Hochul Enacts RAISE Act to Ensure AI Safety Regulations

<div>
    <h2>New York Becomes Second U.S. State to Enact Groundbreaking AI Safety Legislation</h2>

    <p id="speakable-summary" class="wp-block-paragraph">Governor Kathy Hochul has signed the RAISE Act, marking a significant step for AI safety regulations in New York.</p>

    <h3>Overview of the RAISE Act</h3>
    <p class="wp-block-paragraph">In June, New York state lawmakers <a target="_blank" href="https://techcrunch.com/2025/06/13/new-york-passes-a-bill-to-prevent-ai-fueled-disasters/">passed the RAISE Act</a>. However, after pressure from the tech sector, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.axios.com/2025/12/11/ny-gov-kathy-hochul-major-changes-ai-bill">Governor Hochul proposed amendments</a> to simplify the bill. Ultimately, she signed the original legislation while lawmakers agreed to consider her changes in the following year, as reported by <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/19/nyregion/ai-bill-regulations-ny.html">The New York Times</a>.</p>

    <h3>Key Provisions of the Act</h3>
    <p class="wp-block-paragraph">The law mandates that major AI developers disclose their safety protocols and report incidents to the state within 72 hours. A new office within the Department of Financial Services will oversee AI development.</p>

    <h3>Penalties for Non-Compliance</h3>
    <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Companies that fail to submit safety reports or provide misleading information could face fines of up to $1 million, escalating to $3 million for repeat violations.</p>

    <h3>California's Similar Legislation</h3>
    <p class="wp-block-paragraph">In September, California Governor Gavin Newsom <a target="_blank" href="https://techcrunch.com/2025/09/29/california-governor-newsom-signs-landmark-ai-safety-bill-sb-53/">signed a similar AI safety bill</a>. Hochul highlighted this development in <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/governor-hochul-signs-nation-leading-legislation-require-ai-frameworks-ai-frontier-models">her announcement</a>.</p>

    <h3>Governor Hochul's Remarks</h3>
    <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Hochul emphasized, “This law builds on California’s recently adopted framework, creating a unified benchmark among the country’s leading tech states as the federal government lags behind in implementing essential public regulations.”</p>

    <h3>Support and Opposition in the Tech Industry</h3>
    <p class="wp-block-paragraph">State Senator Andrew Gounardes, a key sponsor of the bill, tweeted, “Big Tech thought they could undermine our bill. We stood firm and passed the strongest AI safety law in the nation.”</p>

    <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Interestingly, both OpenAI and Anthropic have expressed support for New York's legislation but are also advocating for federal standards. Anthropic’s external affairs head, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/19/nyregion/ai-bill-regulations-ny.html">Sarah Heck</a>, noted the importance of these state regulations in encouraging Congressional action.</p>

    <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Conversely, a super PAC supported by Andreessen Horowitz and OpenAI President Greg Brockman is targeting Assemblyman Alex Bores, who co-sponsored the bill. Bores commented, “I appreciate the clarity of their position.”</p>

    <h3>Federal Pushback Against State Regulations</h3>
    <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Adding to the complexity, President Donald Trump recently <a target="_blank" href="https://techcrunch.com/2025/12/08/one-rule-trump-says-hell-sign-an-executive-order-blocking-state-ai-laws-despite-bipartisan-pushback/">signed an executive order</a> aimed at challenging state AI laws. Supported by his AI czar <a target="_blank" href="https://techcrunch.com/2025/11/30/new-report-examines-how-david-sacks-might-profit-from-trump-administration-role/">David Sacks</a>, this order signifies an ongoing struggle between federal and state regulatory powers.</p>

    <h3>Discussing the Future of AI Regulation</h3>
    <p class="wp-block-paragraph">We recently covered Trump's executive order and the influence of Sacks and a16z on state AI regulations in an episode of <a target="_blank" href="https://techcrunch.com/podcasts/equity/">the Equity podcast</a>.</p>

    <figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio">
        <p></p>
    </figure>
</div>

This revision incorporates engaging and SEO-optimized headings that enhance readability and structure while keeping the key information intact.

Here are five FAQs regarding New York Governor Kathy Hochul signing the RAISE Act to regulate AI safety:

FAQ 1: What is the RAISE Act?

Answer: The RAISE Act (Regulating Artificial Intelligence Safety and Equity) is a legislative measure signed by Governor Kathy Hochul aimed at ensuring the safe and ethical development of artificial intelligence technologies in New York. It establishes a framework for evaluating AI systems and mitigating potential risks.


FAQ 2: Why was the RAISE Act introduced?

Answer: The RAISE Act was introduced to address growing concerns about the safety, fairness, and transparency of AI technologies. It aims to protect consumers and ensure that AI systems are developed responsibly, prioritizing public welfare and reducing biases in AI applications.


FAQ 3: What are the key provisions of the RAISE Act?

Answer: Key provisions of the RAISE Act include guidelines for the assessment of AI systems, requirements for transparency in AI algorithms, and accountability measures for developers. The act mandates regular audits and the establishment of an advisory board to oversee AI safety standards.


FAQ 4: How will the RAISE Act impact businesses using AI?

Answer: Businesses utilizing AI will need to adhere to the standards set by the RAISE Act, ensuring that their AI systems are evaluated for safety and ethical considerations. This may involve implementing new compliance measures, which could increase operational costs but ultimately lead to more trustworthy and reliable AI applications.


FAQ 5: What are the potential benefits of the RAISE Act for consumers?

Answer: For consumers, the RAISE Act aims to enhance the safety and fairness of AI technologies. By promoting transparency and accountability, the act seeks to reduce biases, protect user privacy, and ensure that AI systems function reliably, fostering greater trust in AI-driven services and products.

Source link