OpenAI Nears Acquisition of Anthropic Based on Ramp’s Business Spending Insights – Unite.AI

OpenAI Surges Ahead of Anthropic in Corporate AI Spending: Key Insights

OpenAI is showing significant growth compared to Anthropic among U.S. businesses for the current quarter, as revealed by new spending data from Ramp. This marks a noticeable shift since Anthropic previously led in corporate AI expenditures three months ago.

Exclusive Insights from the Ramp AI Index

The data comes from the Ramp AI Index, a comprehensive monthly report that tracks AI adoption and spending across over 70,000 American businesses utilizing Ramp’s corporate card and bill payment platform. Because the index relies on actual transaction data—rather than survey responses—it offers a rare glimpse into the performance of these private AI labs within the enterprise sector.

Recent Trends in AI Subscriptions

The latest complete set of figures, covering July 2026 and released on August 12, 2026, shows Anthropic at 43.5% of U.S. businesses subscribing to its services, an increase of 1.1 percentage points since last month. OpenAI follows closely behind at 39.7%, with a more modest rise of 0.23 points. This marks a significant lead for Anthropic, which had been expanding its dominance through July 2026.

OpenAI’s Rapid Growth in Q3

However, Kharazian notes a shift in momentum for Q3, with OpenAI outpacing Anthropic among Ramp’s business users. He attributes this to OpenAI’s newly released flagship model, stating, “GPT-5.6 Sol is proving to be a favorite among developers.” In contrast, he mentions that Anthropic’s Fable 5 model has not met expectations in terms of adoption, influenced by pricing and stringent data retention regulations.

Performance Insights from July’s Data

The August update from Ramp sheds light on these dynamics. Fable 5, launched in July 2026, accounted for just 6% of token purchases by businesses and 11.4% of total spending on Anthropic models—despite being the most expensive option at approximately $10 per million tokens. In comparison, OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 Sol commanded a more substantial 25% share of its token sales and 23% of overall spending at half the cost. Fable 5’s spending was about 75% that of GPT-5.6 Sol in its first month, highlighting its slower market uptake.

A Thriving Market Landscape

The competition is intensifying within a growing market. The Ramp AI Index indicates that overall AI adoption among businesses has reached 55.7%, a rise from just over 50% in March 2026, with spending per customer increasing across all tiers. In July, the average AI-spending business allocated $11.95 per employee monthly, while the top 10% spent $650 and the most elite 1% spent a median of $7,400. AI expenditures on Ramp’s platform have quadrupled over the past year.

Emerging Trends in AI Spending

An additional trend to watch is the growing preference for open-source models. In July, 6.1% of AI-spending businesses utilized model-serving platforms, up from 4.5% in January 2026. Kharazian points out that while first-time AI users predominantly favor American labs, established businesses are increasingly exploring open-source alternatives.

Understanding Ramp’s Data Limitations

It’s crucial to note the limitations of the Ramp AI Index. The sample leans towards the tech industry, reflecting Ramp’s customer demographics, and excludes larger companies that utilize other expense management services. The index only accounts for paid transactions, meaning organizations using free AI tiers are not represented, suggesting actual adoption rates may be higher. Ramp provides percentage data rather than dollar amounts, and the model-level statistics come from a select group of customers engaged with its token spending management product, which likely skews towards the tech sector.

Looking Ahead: Q3 Growth Insights

As we approach the end of the quarter, the growth figures offer a snapshot rather than a concluding judgment. The upcoming Ramp AI Index update, covering August 2026 spending, will reveal whether OpenAI can reclaim its position after losing ground in the spring.

Certainly! Here are five frequently asked questions (FAQs) with answers based on the article "OpenAI Closes on Anthropic in Ramp’s Business Spending Data" from Unite.AI:

1. What is the significance of OpenAI’s recent funding round?

OpenAI has successfully closed a $110 billion funding round, achieving a pre-money valuation of $730 billion. This substantial investment underscores the company’s rapid growth and the increasing demand for its AI technologies. (unite.ai)

2. How does OpenAI’s valuation compare to Anthropic’s?

As of April 2026, Anthropic is considering a $50 billion raise at a valuation between $850 billion and $900 billion. This valuation would more than double Anthropic’s worth in less than three months, positioning it on par with OpenAI as one of the world’s most valuable AI startups. (unite.ai)

3. What role does Ramp play in this context?

Ramp, a New York-based fintech company, has raised a $750 million Series F funding round at a $44 billion valuation. Ramp is expanding its services to include AI-powered finance operations, offering tools that provide businesses with visibility into their AI usage and spending. (unite.ai)

4. How does Ramp’s platform assist businesses in managing AI expenditures?

Ramp’s platform introduces tools that pull token-level usage data from AI providers like Anthropic, OpenAI, and OpenRouter. This allows finance teams to monitor AI usage by provider, model, API key, and team, helping businesses manage and optimize their AI-related expenses. (unite.ai)

5. What does the competition between OpenAI and Anthropic signify for the AI industry?

The competition between OpenAI and Anthropic highlights the rapid advancements and investments in the AI sector. Both companies are striving to secure enterprise customers and funding, indicating a dynamic and competitive landscape as they race to lead in AI technologies and applications. (unite.ai)

These developments reflect the evolving nature of the AI industry, with significant investments and strategic moves shaping the future of AI technologies and their applications in various sectors.

Source link

California Bill to Regulate AI Companion Chatbots Nears Legal Approval

California Takes Major Steps to Regulate AI with SB 243 Bill

California has made significant progress in the regulation of artificial intelligence.
SB 243 — a pivotal bill aimed at regulating AI companion chatbots to safeguard minors and vulnerable users — has passed both the State Assembly and Senate with bipartisan support, and is now on its way to Governor Gavin Newsom’s desk.

Next Steps for SB 243: Awaiting the Governor’s Decision

Governor Newsom has until October 12 to either sign the bill into law or issue a veto. If signed, SB 243 is set to take effect on January 1, 2026, positioning California as the first state to mandate safety protocols for AI chatbot operators, ensuring companies are held legally accountable for compliance.

Key Provisions of the Bill: Protecting Minors from Harmful Content

The legislation focuses specifically on preventing AI companion chatbots — defined as AI systems providing adaptive, human-like responses to meet users’ social needs — from discussing topics related to suicidal thoughts, self-harm, or sexually explicit material.

User Alerts and Reporting Requirements: Ensuring Transparency

Platforms will be required to notify users every three hours — particularly minors — reminding them they are interacting with an AI chatbot and encouraging breaks. The bill also mandates annual reporting and transparency requirements for AI companies, including major players like OpenAI, Character.AI, and Replika, commencing July 1, 2027.

Legal Recourse: Empowering Users to Seek Justice

SB 243 grants individuals who believe they’ve been harmed due to violations the right to pursue lawsuits against AI companies for injunctive relief, damages of up to $1,000 per violation, and recovery of attorney’s fees.

The Context: A Response to Recent Tragedies and Scandals

Introduced in January by Senators Steve Padilla and Josh Becker, SB 243 gained traction following the tragic suicide of teenager Adam Raine, who engaged in prolonged conversations with OpenAI’s ChatGPT regarding self-harm. The legislation is also a response to leaked
internal documents from Meta indicating their chatbots were permitted to have “romantic” interactions with children.

Increased Scrutiny on AI Platforms: Federal and State Actions

Recently, U.S. lawmakers and regulators have heightened their scrutiny of AI platforms. The
Federal Trade Commission is set to investigate the implications of AI chatbots on children’s mental health.

Legislators Call for Urgent Action: Emphasizing the Need for Safer AI

“The harm is potentially great, which means we have to move quickly,” Padilla told TechCrunch, emphasizing the importance of ensuring that minors are aware they are not interacting with real humans and connecting users with appropriate resources during distress.

Striking a Balance: Navigating Regulation and Innovation

Despite initial comprehensive requirements, SB 243 underwent amendments that diluted some provisions, such as tracking discussions around suicidal ideation. Becker expressed confidence that the bill appropriately balances addressing harm without imposing unfeasible compliance demands on companies.

The Future of AI Regulation: A Broader Context

As Silicon Valley companies channel millions into pro-AI political action committees ahead of upcoming elections, SB 243 is advancing alongside another proposal,
SB 53, aimed at enhancing transparency in AI operations. Major tech players like Meta, Google, and Amazon are rallying against SB 53, while only
Anthropic supports it.

A Collaborative Approach to Regulation: Insights from Leaders

“Innovation and regulation are not mutually exclusive,” Padilla stated, highlighting the potential benefits of AI technology while calling for reasonable safeguards for vulnerable populations.

A Character.AI spokesperson conveyed their commitment to working with regulators to ensure user safety, noting existing warnings in their chat experience that emphasize the fictional nature of AI interactions.

Meta has opted not to comment on the legislative developments, while TechCrunch has reached out to OpenAI, Anthropic, and Replika for their perspectives.

Here are five FAQs regarding the California bill regulating AI companion chatbots:

FAQ 1: What is the purpose of the California bill regulating AI companion chatbots?

Answer: The bill aims to establish guidelines for the development and use of AI companion chatbots, ensuring they are safe, transparent, and respectful of users’ privacy. It seeks to protect users from potential harms associated with misinformation, emotional manipulation, and data misuse.

FAQ 2: What specific regulations does the bill propose for AI chatbots?

Answer: The bill proposes several key regulations, including requirements for transparency about the chatbot’s AI nature, user consent for data collection, and safeguards against harmful content. Additionally, it mandates that users are informed when they are interacting with a bot rather than a human.

FAQ 3: Who will be responsible for enforcing the regulations if the bill becomes law?

Answer: Enforcement will primarily fall under the jurisdiction of the state’s Attorney General or designated regulatory agencies. They will have the power to impose penalties on companies that violate the established guidelines.

FAQ 4: How will this bill impact developers of AI companion chatbots?

Answer: Developers will need to comply with the new regulations, which may involve implementing transparency measures, modifying data handling practices, and ensuring their chatbots adhere to ethical standards. This could require additional resources and training for developers.

FAQ 5: When is the bill expected to take effect if it becomes law?

Answer: If passed, the bill is expected to take effect within a specified timeframe set by the legislature, likely allowing a period for developers to adapt to the new regulations. This timeframe will be detailed in the final version of the law.

Source link

California Bill Aiming to Regulate AI Companion Chatbots Nears Enactment

The California Assembly Takes a Stand: New Regulations for AI Chatbots

In a significant move toward safeguarding minors and vulnerable users, the California State Assembly has passed SB 243, a bill aimed at regulating AI companion chatbots. With bipartisan support, the legislation is set for a final vote in the state Senate this Friday.

Introducing Safety Protocols for AI Chatbot Operators

Should Governor Gavin Newsom approve the bill, it will come into effect on January 1, 2026, positioning California as the first state to mandate that AI chatbot operators adopt safety measures and assume legal responsibility for any failures in these systems.

Preventing Harmful Interactions with AI Companions

The bill targets AI companions capable of human-like interaction that might expose users to sensitive topics, such as suicidal thoughts or explicit content. Key provisions include regular reminders for users—every three hours for minors—that they are interacting with AI, along with annual transparency reports from major companies like OpenAI, Character.AI, and Replika.

Empowering Individuals to Seek Justice

SB 243 allows individuals who suffer harm due to violations to pursue legal action against AI companies, seeking damages up to $1,000 per infraction along with attorney’s fees.

A Response to Growing Concerns

The legislation gained momentum after the tragic suicide of a teenager, Adam Raine, who had extensive interactions with OpenAI’s ChatGPT, raising alarms about the potential dangers of chatbots. It also follows leaked documents indicating Meta’s chatbots were permitted to engage in inappropriate conversations with minors.

Intensifying Scrutiny Surrounding AI Platforms

As scrutiny of AI systems increases, the Federal Trade Commission is gearing up to investigate the impact of AI chatbots on children’s mental health, while investigations into Meta and Character.AI are being spearheaded by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.

Legislators Call for Quick Action and Accountability

State Senator Steve Padilla emphasized the urgency of implementing effective safeguards to protect minors. He advocates for AI companies to disclose data regarding their referrals to crisis services for a better understanding of the potential harms associated with these technologies.

Amendments Modify Initial Requirements

While SB 243 initially proposed stricter measures, many requirements were eliminated, including the prohibition of “variable reward” tactics designed to increase user engagement, which can lead to addictive behaviors. The revised bill also drops mandates for tracking discussions surrounding suicidal ideation.

Finding a Balance: Innovation vs. Regulation

Senator Josh Becker believes the current version of the bill strikes the right balance, addressing harms without imposing unfeasible regulations. Meanwhile, Silicon Valley companies are investing heavily in pro-AI political action committees, aiming to influence upcoming elections.

The Path Forward: Navigating AI Safety Regulations

SB 243 is making its way through the legislative process as California considers another critical piece of legislation, SB 53, which will enforce reporting transparency. In contrast, tech giants oppose this measure, advocating for more lenient regulations.

Combining Innovation with Safeguards

Padilla argues that innovation and regulation should coexist, emphasizing the need for responsible practices that can protect our most vulnerable while allowing for technological advancement.

TechCrunch has reached out to prominent AI companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, Character.AI, and Replika for further commentary.

Here are five frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding the California bill that aims to regulate AI companion chatbots:

FAQ 1: What is the purpose of the California bill regulating AI companion chatbots?

Answer: The bill aims to ensure the safety and transparency of AI companion chatbots, addressing concerns related to user privacy, misinformation, and the potential emotional impact on users. It seeks to create guidelines for the ethical use and development of these technologies.

FAQ 2: How will the regulation affect AI chatbot developers?

Answer: Developers will need to comply with specific standards, including transparency about data handling, user consent protocols, and measures for preventing harmful interactions. This may involve disclosing the chatbot’s AI nature and providing clear information about data usage.

FAQ 3: What protections will users have under this bill?

Answer: Users will gain better access to information about how their personal data is used and stored. Additionally, safeguards will be implemented to minimize the risk of emotional manipulation and ensure that chatbots do not disseminate harmful or misleading information.

FAQ 4: Will this bill affect existing AI chatbots on the market?

Answer: Yes, existing chatbots may need to be updated to comply with the new regulations, particularly regarding user consent and transparency. Developers will be required to assess their current systems to align with the forthcoming legal standards.

FAQ 5: When is the bill expected to be enacted into law?

Answer: The bill is in the final stages of the legislative process and is expected to be enacted soon, although an exact date for implementation may vary based on the legislative timeline and any necessary amendments before it becomes law.

Source link